Chat Help Settings Subscription Blog Banned Users Search

Advertisement

Go Back   Houston-Imports.com > Off-Topic > Ramblings > The Classroom

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 09-28-2010, 02:35 PM   #1
MoToHeAd125
Lets go fetus hunting...
 
MoToHeAd125's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Woodlands Area
Posts: 5,167
Car: Stage II 04 WRX STI
Send a message via AIM to MoToHeAd125
FDA Corruption

I really havn't paid much attention to this subject recently but after following some biotech investments, namely Arena Pharmaceuticals (ARNA) and researched past events with Dendreon (DNDN) I've grown concerned with this issue.

Here are a few points I would like to point out for discussion.
1. Dendreon's drug provenge, an effective prostate cancer drug was rejected for approval by the FDA after receiving a positive approval vote on a review panel in 2007. The FDA wanted more studies citing it wasn't effective because it didn't decrease tumor size. however it extended survivability. I believe chemo-therapy companies lined the pockets of the FDA directors to reject this. After much public outrage, and loss of life that could have been saved the drug was finally approved.

2. Arena's drug Lorcaserin goes up for approval decision on Oct. 22nd. A few of you may have seen my posts talking about this company in the money section. Before Arena's recommendation panel the FDA is supposed to release briefing documents which overview the issues and discussions to be had the day of the panel. These documents are supposed to be private to the company and FDA until 2 days before.

What is suspicious to me is over the 2 week period before the document release several analysts downgraded Arena based off of no news citing a 50% cut in price. Why? Arena has the only obesity drug with the safest profile proven by clinical trials. In addition to the downgrade short interest in the stock increased to 40%, about 40million shares. Tuesday before the panel review, the documents are released. In pre-market trading the price tanks. News stories pop up everywhere citing issues with cancer in rats during pre-clinical trials. This document was 270 pages. I don't know who could mow through that, and INSTANTLY have a story posted everywhere in the morning, in some cases before they were even posted on the FDA website. I believe the FDA or someone leaked this documents to hedge funds in order to generate billions.

Fast forward to the panel. Most media outlets wont tell you that the FDA combined data of benign tumors and malignant tumors to reached statistical significance. Why would any medical professional combine benign tumors? Even at that, malignant tumors only showed significance at 84x the human dose. FDA guidance dismisses anything above 25x. In addition during the panel review they included no Oncologist, toxicologist, or any cancer expert. Why is this? After the director using comments such as "If you approve this drug your name will be forever attached to a drug that causes cancer," suggests they scared their incompetent "experts" into voting no. The shorts won, using their fear campaign they got people to panic sell, hit stop loss triggers, and cripple the stock, gaining massive profits in the meantime.

3. The Facts:

1) The FDA's Commisioner, Margaret Hamburg, is married to Peter Brown.
2) Peter Brown is co-CEO of Renaissance Technologies.
3) Renaissance Technologies runs four hedge funds.
4) The Medallion Fund is their "private fund"; it's is the only RT fund that is closed to outside investors, owned only by employees of RT.
5) Congress did not require that Dr. Hamburg and her husband divest themselves of their involvement in the Medallion Fund, as it is a quant fund, with human input only given "in rare instances". (Rare? Maybe, but human "input" is still possible.) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124328188115551961.html
6) The Medallion Fund FAR outperforms not only the other Renaissance funds, but most funds overall; in 2008, the Medallion Fund returned 80%, while the other funds struggled or crumbled.

"Astonishingly, out of the 148 months that elapsed between January 1993 and April 2005, Medallion only had 17 monthly losses. Out of 49 quarters in the same time period, Medallion only posted three quarterly losses. Additionally, it has seen a yearly Sharpe ratio of 1.68. In twelve plus years of trading, Rentec's Medallion Fund has never had a down year."

Another article showing internal scientists are coerced into unethical actions by management.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123142562104564381.html

Here is an online petition for approval of Arena's drug Lorqess. In it you will find more detail about the summary I gave and what actually happened. Also sign the petition if you want to help an American small biotech stand up to this injustice.

http://www.petitiononline.com/passlorc/petition.html

Yes I do have a small long position in this company. This was one of the first stocks i started buying 5 yrs ago when I was 21.

I know its a lot to read, but this is the classroom GTFO or STFU if your going to complain.

Discuss

-Motohead125
MoToHeAd125 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisement
Old 09-28-2010, 02:54 PM   #2
MBGTO
Told Ya So in '08
 
MBGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In the 2-7
Posts: 3,977
Car: '09 Charger R/T '05 GTO
Send a message via AIM to MBGTO Send a message via Yahoo to MBGTO
Not sure how credible the source is but I did find this, the article is from September 17

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seeking Alpha
....Tuesday we learned that the FDA didn’t think very highly of lorcaserin’s efficacy, regardless of any guidelines it met. More troubling, however, was the FDA’s stance on reported cancer in rats. While Arena made the case that the cancer is not relevant to humans, the FDA insisted that they had not done enough to rule out the potential cancer threat.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/2258...serin-what-now
MBGTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 02:58 PM   #3
Replica
Art Vandelay
 
Replica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 45,374
Car: 06 NC, 05 Focus ST
FDA did some shadey stuff to get artificial sweeteners on the market. Nothing new about the FDA being corrupt.
Replica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 03:01 PM   #4
MoToHeAd125
Lets go fetus hunting...
 
MoToHeAd125's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Woodlands Area
Posts: 5,167
Car: Stage II 04 WRX STI
Send a message via AIM to MoToHeAd125
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBGTO View Post
Not sure how credible the source is but I did find this, the article is from September 17



http://seekingalpha.com/article/2258...serin-what-now
Yes i admit the efficacy wasn't stupendous, but they did hit the FDA benchmarks set in their 2007 guidelines. There is no gray area here, either you hit what they wanted or didn't. The FDA shouldn't state targets if they wont stand behind them.

Arena did the best they could with the rat trials, i just think it smells rotten that they manipulated the data on tumors to reach statistical significance, and no oncologists appointed by the FDA to give their expert review? Cmon. ROTTEN i tell you ROTTEN!
MoToHeAd125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 03:11 PM   #5
MBGTO
Told Ya So in '08
 
MBGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In the 2-7
Posts: 3,977
Car: '09 Charger R/T '05 GTO
Send a message via AIM to MBGTO Send a message via Yahoo to MBGTO
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoToHeAd125 View Post
Yes i admit the efficacy wasn't stupendous, but they did hit the FDA benchmarks set in their 2007 guidelines. There is no gray area here, either you hit what they wanted or didn't. The FDA shouldn't state targets if they wont stand behind them.

Arena did the best they could with the rat trials, i just think it smells rotten that they manipulated the data on tumors to reach statistical significance, and no oncologists appointed by the FDA to give their expert review? Cmon. ROTTEN i tell you ROTTEN!
I dunno, just showing what I found with a simple search. I could see that raising some eye brows. I don't doubt one bit that the FDA is corrupt just like pretty much every other government agency ran by the Federal Government.
MBGTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 03:11 PM   #6
Dopavash
Don't FAL me, Bro.
 
Dopavash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 23,276
Car: BubbleGum Pink s2k
Send a message via AIM to Dopavash
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replica View Post
FDA did some shadey stuff to get artificial sweeteners on the market. Nothing new about the FDA being corrupt.
+1 on that mess. My body rejects that crap outright. I take a sip of Diet Coke and my innards twist up immediately.
Dopavash is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Advertisement

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
Page generated in 0.11371 seconds with 21 queries