| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Banned Users |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#61 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Car:
|
I wanted to multi quote, but....fk that.
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Outside, looking in...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston (Aldine)
Posts: 14,537
Car: 93 240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Mandingo Warrior
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Htown
Posts: 1,562
Car: 95 mitsu GSX
|
I never give up ever.
Easy to say when you are not in the situation, anyway the Govt will always care for the less fortunate no matter what you say. Just suck it up its out of our control You under estimate the power of cooperate greed. What Govt intervention? The health care system pretty much runs itself, are you talking about Obamacare? be specific on this intervention. That would never work ever, you are assuming that these healthcare institutions aren't out to make money and not being endorsed by certain Pharm companies. That is actually a very good idea and I love it, but unfortunately it will never happen, without medicare/medicaid the hospitals will crumble. You have no idea how many services they pay for. Looking at the price of equipment, its maintenance plus, payroll, well just overall day to day running of the hospitals shit might hit the fan. I love my job because it pays well, treats me good, plus gives me great bonuses and insentives, fuck you I like it like it is. I I like constant money coming in to the hospital from the Govt, corrupt Pharm companies, and equipment producing companies(MRIs,syringes and shit), if we made money from just two of those shit will hit the fan for me. We can't survive on insurance companies and patients alone. The real world sucks man. What you are saying is like a running back stating how he will run over the defense and stiff arm everybody then dive into the end zone, can it be done sure, but that's assuming that all goes well and the defenders are easy to beat. we all know better. Yet again that is a good idea on paper. You keep assuming that people are going to continue being sick(which they are), where do you think this money they are competing for comes from. There are a lot of serious downs in the industry, even now shit is slowing and cancellations are increasing, I want you to stop assuming everything is going to go to plan. The Govt might not spend money better than you but the can put it in places that you won't. America becoming America again. I want know what decade this was. Last edited by Afroclipse; 09-08-2009 at 01:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Mandingo Warrior
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Htown
Posts: 1,562
Car: 95 mitsu GSX
|
I pay taxes because my Govt as me to, my small contribution helps pay for many services that I may not like and some that I do. I have to do what I can for the collective, watch ants very closely.
They take a lot of money from me but to tell you the truth I don't even check to see who takes money out and what for, I even contribute more to Htown with a couple tickets a year . You are overly passionate about your dislike of the current govt, tell me when did you start noticing these things?LOL, thats just stupid, nobody in govt does anything remotely close to that. Thats the dopeyass in you. Oh I haven't lost buddy not by a long shot, you just won a battle because I ran out of ammo, but guess what 'I'm back i'm back no 16 bit like sega genesis'. Oh America wasn't built on free market along kimosabe Thats just the road it took because it was practical and businesses would have refused to go social. America was not a single entity then branched out like other Countries, it was a group of different states that came together as one, having the Govt just take control of everything would have been taken kindly by each group. now that it has united well who knows. I'm not advocating socialism just discussing the subject. There are too many branches of business and shit all together so it would take coup to socialize this country. This article is about the economic term. For the board game, see Monopoly (game). For other uses, see Monopoly (disambiguation). MONOPOLY In economics, a monopoly (from Greek monos / μονος alone or single + polein / πωλειν, to sell) exists when a specific individual or an enterprise has sufficient control over a particular product or service to determine significantly the terms on which other individuals shall have access to it.[1][clarification needed] Monopolies are thus characterized by a lack of economic competition for the good or service that they provide and a lack of viable substitute goods. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
A Man of Increase
|
Give up what? Playing devils pot stirring advocate?
You give yourself too much credit. What's next? You gonna find me too? ![]() Spare me the whole "less fortunate" argument. I always hear bleeding heart stories about how people are products of their environment and how they were given a shitty hand at life. I've got news for ya...do something about it! There are people in this country who are deaf, blind or disabled and still manage to be productive members of society. Nobody said life was easy, and I am not saying that people shouldn't offer a helping hand but in the end people have to want to help themselves...and I don't mean help themselves to charity or govt social programs...I mean help themselves and take person responsibility for themselves and their own lives. LOL! CARE??? You think the govt actually cares about the less fortunate?? ![]() And believe me, I think everyone has been putting up with it for a long time. (HI spell check must be turned off, eh?) What govt intervention? For starters, Social Security, HMO/Medicare-Medicaid. The govt fucked all that up and you think they'll get it right with Obamacare? Oh yeah, but the ideas for Obamacare sound good on paper. the idea that it was a lack of government supervision that allowed ‘greed’ in the private sectors to lead the nation into crises that only our beltway saviors can solve is complete garbage! Your government regulators were precisely the ones who imposed lower mortgage lending standards— and it was members of Congress (of both parties) who pushed the regulators, the banks and the mortgage-buying giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, into accepting risky mortgages, in the name of "affordable housing" and more home ownership. Presidents of both parties also jumped on the bandwagon. Oh but now we need more regulation overhauls in healthcare!! ![]() Lowest price/highest quality ALWAYS wins out in a truly free market economy. People are always gonna go for the best bang for the buck. And I'll say what's been said in here many times..."WTF is the govt doing trying to run healthcare in the first place!" Look at their track record! It's FUBAR! Yet you still wanna keep a FUBAR system running even though it's fucking everyone over. Like their own pockets? Call in the Czars!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Mandingo Warrior
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Htown
Posts: 1,562
Car: 95 mitsu GSX
|
Not if you tell me where you are ![]() I don't condone welfare or Govt assisted programs but that not what my point was. No they don't but they have to please their citizens by offering them such programs. propaganda, this subject is to vast. Nice dodge I will try to spell right so you don't next time. Oh I see, so you can trust the Govt to supervise the companies but not take charge when the companies are sucking at there jobs. Fannie mae situation was a attempt by Govt to try and stimulate the economy by opening up more loans with the hope that average Joe would pay some of his dues. I think you have a problem with the Govt and the programs they have failed to make work. Like I have been saying a lot of shit sounds good on paper but its not guaranteed to work. What do you do when you come up with a program but your citizens abuse it and cause problems in the economy, you try to force something on them so they have to pay but they complain about freedoms, its just the way the country is my friend I just pay taxes and watch it unfold. Yes but that would put many hospitals out of business, I got Jayz's album bootleg for $3 a few days ago, compare that to $15. Your way will reduce the value of care due to lack of adequate pay for employees as well as have inferior equipment. Those CAT scans don't pay for themselves and cost a few million, its like pitting Olive Garden vs Mcdonalds, how long you think you will enjoy that Olive Garden lifestyle if its competing against Mcdonalds prices. Be serious and realistic, like I said I see where you are coming from but reality is a bitch, Whats so great about what we have now, medicare/medicaid is not in shambles I dont know where you got your shit from but its working like it should, its a fucking civic not a Bentley. Social security on the other hand I don't know much about so I won't chime in on that. LOL, come on give you senator a little more credit, |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
The Stig's Mexican Cousin
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sugarland
Posts: 11,897
Car: 2004 Mazda Roadster Turbo
Blog Entries: 9
|
response to all of afros 'points'.
The reason you don't see the point we are trying to make is because you are starting from a flawed assumption on why things work. Every one of your arguments/points presumes that because government has been involved in something for the past 50+ years, that 'thats the way it is'. That FACTS are: 1) The government is not supposed to be involved in these types of projects. thats not their charter, and unless you squinch up your eyes, put your hands in front of your face, and hum very loudly, there is no way any rational human being could pretend they haven't been way over the line for many years. However, if you use the same flawed logic that you are, it's ok, because after you let the government push back the limits of their power a bit, the next time they want to, you have a precedent that says it's ok for them to do so. 2) The reason it's called the law of supply and demand is because it's a NATURAL law, like gravity or motion. just because the results of those laws are inconvenient, doesn't mean they aren't still in force. The course of action your supporting/advocating fundamentally ignores the laws of supply and demand, by creating a ponzi scheme, essentially passing the buck, and shifting the burden of responsibility away from the people who benefit, and onto 'the government', who doesn't actually pay, but takes credit for 'fixing' a problem. In this way, it becomes possible for our government to take money away from us, spend twice as much as they pull in, and still make it our fault when their flawed systems fail. The consequences of ignoring those laws in your policies result in corrections in the systems your manipulating. The LOGICAL result of massive government investment in health care will be a huge boom in health care, followed by a massive bust in the health care system, when the government trys to transfer the debt burden around. 3) The existing government programs are inefficient, too large, and too slow compared to their private sector equivalents. And before you talk about how terrible health insurance companies are, consult your history book. The current system of HMOs, that your company is FORCED to offer you, if you have a job, by law. That right, the HMO system was created by the government to force employers to buy into a hugely bureaucratic system, that is ripe with inefficiency, corruption, and only exists to grow itself. I notice also you seem to presume 'profit' is some evil motivator, that forces decisions people make about things completely wrong. Yet you ignore the governments arbitrary decisions? Their 'profit' is more growth, more power, and bigger government. They realize that those things result in more money into their pockets, but not through anything they contribute directly. Oh and, medicare/Medicaid costs are accelerating, while the money being paid into them is staying the same or going down. Because it's a ponzi scheme. And you don't have as many people paying in now as you have pulling out AND the costs of subsidized medicine are artificially high, those dollars also don't go as far, the 'perfect storm' has been put in place for a national health care crisis. and now we get to hear about 'too big to fail' 'emergency measures' and 'must have a public option for health care' to 'save' us from a fucked up policy. Last edited by Flores; 09-08-2009 at 06:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
H-I's Wingman
|
Because they Ask you to? What happens if you don't? They throw you in jail, by force. Is that asking? Hell no. Its compulsion. You are overtly in love with the government. Who in the hell put it in your mind that the government has ever been a benevolent force?
Sure they do. That's exactly what you want to do, through the government. that's the whole point of an income tax. For you not to see that is the ignorant idiot in you. You lost this argument before it began. Like Flores said, you're working from an extremely flawed premise, along with a sheer lack of historical and sociological knowledge. Wow. That is the single most false, stupid and ignorant comment that has EVER been made on this site. OF COURSE this nation was founded on a free market. It was built on personal freedoms and individual liberties too. Read a freaking history book. Or a steady encroachment, one that's been going on for 100 years. I know what a monopoly is, and, the only entity in this country that holds any monopolies is the Federal Government. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Banned
|
I never meet someone as seriously flawed as Afro is, he makes Gunz look like a conservative in comparison.
I miss Gunz. This guy is stupid and no fun, like debating on the playground with a 4 year old.Gunz please come back. BTW Afro, just because you work at a hospital doesn't make you smart. Please let us know what hospital you work at so we can be taken to another one in case of a issue, I would like to get medical service from a place that hires people with a education. Last edited by VolksFaggin; 09-08-2009 at 07:17 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Lowest Car Here
|
![]() Last edited by blackout01; 09-08-2009 at 07:27 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Lowest Car Here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
H-I's Wingman
|
You've done nothing so far but defend these Statist programs. That comes pretty damned close to condoning.
The Government's role is not to please anyone, but to protect our individual liberties and our chosen way of life. Living off of the government, thus being a tax eater, thus living off of my income should NEVER be an option. I'm pretty sure he just laid out why the government failed at supervision, and was in fact directly responsible, if only in (LARGE) part. To stimulate the economy? LOL! Look how great that worked out! Lets do it to healthcare! ![]() Of course he has a problem with failed Government programs, and you should too. So, you're making an argument against social programs now? We know that nothing works like it does on paper. We've seen social programs fail time and time again (Social Security, both medicare and medicaid, Welfare, Unemployment etc); None of them correct the problem they're designed to. Reality is truly a bitch. Particularly to you because, in reality, McDonalds and Olive Garden ARE competing. I think they're both doing great just fine, too. I think that's pretty representative of your understanding of economics. Medicare is not in Shambles? It has a $36TRILLION unfunded liability. How in God's name is that not in shambles? It's going to be bankrupt in the next 15 years. How is that not in shambles? Social programs account for half, HALF of every dollar our government spends. |
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
www.gotkyle.com
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Clear Lake
Posts: 14,018
Car:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Art Vandelay
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 35,842
Car: Some Fords
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Car:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|