PDA

View Full Version : VW apprentices build 301hp Golf GTI Street


VH_Supra26
05-22-2009, 09:21 AM
by Alex Kaufmann
http://www.motorauthority.com/content/thumbs/g/o/golf_gti_street_main_630_1-0521-630x360.jpg
The four 19-22 year olds built 'the GTI Street' in just 3 months

Custom-tuned turbocharged four-cylinder hatches are pretty common fare anywhere in the world. But it's not every day that a handful of young apprentices at one of the world's biggest carmakers turn out a car that turns heads like the Golf GTI Street

Built around a heavily modified 2.0L TFSI engine, the apprentices also packaged some other sophisticated gear into the street-mod GTI. A coilover suspension kit is a must-have for the category, but it also features a hydraulic ride height adjustment - a first for the GTI.

Beyond the performance and suspension mods, the team - four young men aged 19-22 - also fit 19in wheels with 225-width tires and brakes adapted from the famed R32. A completely black-and-white treatment inside and out plus some custom badge work wrap up the GTI Street's unique design.

The car was built for exhibition at the 2009 Wörthersee Tour, and will be on display alongside the Polo GTI Concept revealed yesterday.

All Content Copyright 2006-2008 Motor Authority

http://www.motorauthority.com/vw-apprentices-build-301hp-golf-gti-vi.html

CZero
05-22-2009, 10:44 AM
sounds like just a k04 kit.

Replica
05-22-2009, 10:52 AM
Looks terrible.

VQuick
05-22-2009, 11:06 AM
I'd rather just see a Golf R36 with the 300hp V6 from the Passat of the same name.

Dorian
05-22-2009, 11:12 AM
^So you can see even more understeer like the VR6 model of the Golf? lolz

VQuick
05-22-2009, 12:58 PM
^So you can see even more understeer like the VR6 model of the Golf? lolz

The MKV R32 can actually oversteer a bit. I imagine it wouldn't be much different with the 3.6L.

Hyper
05-22-2009, 02:00 PM
Nice!!

uneek
05-22-2009, 03:27 PM
power and brakes hooray
looks ghey

CZero
05-22-2009, 11:29 PM
^So you can see even more understeer like the VR6 model of the Golf? lolz

You do realize the R series are awd right?:facepalm:
Besides, the vr6 was a mkiv, which was garbage on wheels.

eN_2_Oh
05-23-2009, 12:42 AM
nice number.

unitedelements
05-23-2009, 07:39 PM
expected more

terrorboyz
05-23-2009, 08:01 PM
dont like blck and white on hood....doesnt flow at all

VashThaStampede
05-23-2009, 08:11 PM
You do realize the R series are awd right?:facepalm:
Besides, the vr6 was a mkiv, which was garbage on wheels.


:facepalm::facepalm: VAG awd systems tend to be rear biased..thus creating understeer,,,:facepalm::facepalm:

CZero
05-25-2009, 02:25 AM
:facepalm::facepalm: VAG awd systems tend to be rear biased..thus creating understeer,,,:facepalm::facepalm:
Wow, you're pretty stupid sometimes, I gotta say.
Not only would a rear bias create oversteer, but the system in the R32 is capable of putting almost all torque to the rear wheels when needed based on traction conditions, but is otherwise 100% front biased when the front tires experience no slippage.
"Thus", you fail.

Besides, he mentioned vr6 golfs, not R32's. The fwd VR6 gti has loads of understeer. The R32 does not.
Either way you were wrong in everything you said, congrats it's not easy to be so wrong:weirdo:

ikonaccord
05-25-2009, 04:33 AM
Looks terrible.

french fries
05-26-2009, 10:44 AM
A "Heavily modified" 2.0 motor putting down 301hp? Is there a "fail" icon?

Stevenc
05-26-2009, 12:17 PM
^ Agreed. 300 crank from a heavily modified 2.0 is pretty crap

vdubsunday
05-26-2009, 02:01 PM
Wow, you're pretty stupid sometimes, I gotta say.
Not only would a rear bias create oversteer, but the system in the R32 is capable of putting almost all torque to the rear wheels when needed based on traction conditions, but is otherwise 100% front biased when the front tires experience no slippage.
"Thus", you fail.

Besides, he mentioned vr6 golfs, not R32's. The fwd VR6 gti has loads of understeer. The R32 does not.
Either way you were wrong in everything you said, congrats it's not easy to be so wrong:weirdo:

:roflmao:

Mr. Stone
05-26-2009, 03:51 PM
^ Agreed. 300 crank from a heavily modified 2.0 is pretty crap

It's all perspective. Heavily modified to us may not be the same as to the writer.

I think it looks good.