PDA

View Full Version : GM starts seeking concessions from UAW, bondholders


VH_Supra26
01-06-2009, 01:08 AM
by Ralph Hanson
http://www.motorauthority.com/content/thumbs/u/a/uaw_logo_main_630-1203-636x360.jpg
Getting key partners to ease their contractual obligations will be tough

The UAW's near-stranglehold on the domestic auto industry has taken a lot of the blame for the current condition of the carmakers. Whether it's a fair conclusion or not, however, for companies like General Motors to survive, there will have to be concessions from labor and investors alike. Formal concessions negotiations with a range of partners begin this week, with the spotlight on the UAW.

Delving into the UAW's labor contracts will be a hard-fought issue, however, as the union is expected to resist at every turn. The contract negotiated in 2007 is still in effect, and to achieve the changes GM must have to ensure future sustainability, the contract will have to change. Up to 31,000 jobs will go, reports The Detroit News, along with nine plant closures.

A number of conditions built into the loans granted by the Bush Administration at the end of December include stipulations that would reduce wages to levels competitive with non-union foreign carmakers by 2009 and require the UAW to accept stock in the place of half the cash payments made to its health care trust fund by 2010.

Further concessions from the UAW, such as wage cuts or reductions in benefits packages are also being sought. UAW President Ron Gettelfinger thinks the Bush loan package unfairly targets the union as the primary vehicle for cutbacks, and hopes Barack Obama will change things when he takes office later this month.

All Content Copyright 2006-2008 Motor Authority

http://www.motorauthority.com/gm-starts-seeking-concessions-from-uaw-bondholders.html

rene
01-06-2009, 01:13 AM
no comment.

Red88Si
01-06-2009, 02:28 AM
Good. Maybe after they trim the fat around the edges of the company, they can get back to the technological race with the Japanese they've been lagging in for the past 30 years. I mean seriously, why does anything have cam-in-block engines nowadays?

syntheticGT
01-06-2009, 07:48 AM
Good. Maybe after they trim the fat around the edges of the company, they can get back to the technological race with the Japanese they've been lagging in for the past 30 years. I mean seriously, why does anything have cam-in-block engines nowadays?

LOL!!!

OHC engines are not the be-all-end-all of motor technology. If they can make a OHV engine just as efficient then why not?

I do agree with the technology race but in different aspects.

eN_2_Oh
01-06-2009, 11:34 AM
finally they shed some light on that shadowed parasite they call the UAW. this should lighten the load on the big 3, and give them more money to throw at R&D rather than the pockets of the UAW.

dantheman
01-06-2009, 12:37 PM
Good. Maybe after they trim the fat around the edges of the company, they can get back to the technological race with the Japanese they've been lagging in for the past 30 years. I mean seriously, why does anything have cam-in-block engines nowadays?
because it works and is reliable.

cam in block is cheaper to produce and makes incredible power AND torque.

seinkonnen
01-06-2009, 01:33 PM
Good. Maybe after they trim the fat around the edges of the company, they can get back to the technological race with the Japanese they've been lagging in for the past 30 years. I mean seriously, why does anything have cam-in-block engines nowadays?

OHC motors have been around as long as OHV (cam-in-block) motors. Secondly, OHV motors will almost always make more power in any car under $300k. GM made 640hp out of a 6.2L motor with a blower for $100,000, Ferrari did it with a N/A 650hp DOHC 6.0L V12 that revs to 8,200rpm and costs $1,000,000. And the GM motor is up on torque by about 115ft-lbs. So, that's basically why (cost). All we get out of OHC technology down in the normal car arena is fuel economy and vtak.

F1 is the pinnacle of OHC technology, but again thats because they can afford it.