glass

[Slim ThuG]

what lenses do you currently own? And which of those do you use the most.

In addition, what do you pro's suggest is good to have in your bag?


for my d70 i have: the kit lens 18-70, 50mm 1.8, and 70-300 ED

for the d50: 18-55, and 70-300

[Todd Spoth]

135mm f2L
16-35mm f2.8L
24-70mm f2.8L
70-200mm f2.8L
120-300mm f2.8EX
50mm f2.5 Macro + LSC

i have a bunch of other random lenses but these are my workhorses.

i want a 400mm 2.8L but you know. :(

[Johnny Thunders]

Two crappy lenses. I really need to up my glass collection.

[Slim ThuG]

those of you who have a lens with IS/VR, is it worth the extra $?

[mr toolio]

i have used a 70-200 mm IS and non-IS.. i couldnt tell you the difference. but then again, i wasnt shooting anything fast. it might work better for sports photos.

adam

[SloESLex]

24-70 2.8
1200 2.8L
50 1.4
50 1.8


hey hott Toddy. opinion on 17-40L? also considering 15mm fish.

also, do you know how well those proggys work for the fisheyes?...the whole image manipulation thing a ma jigger that removes the fisheye effect?

[Slim ThuG]

24-70 2.8
1200 2.8L
50 1.4
50 1.8


hey hott Toddy. opinion on 17-40L? also considering 15mm fish.

also, do you know how well those proggys work for the fisheyes?...the whole image manipulation thing a ma jigger that removes the fisheye effect?
i hear the sigma 15mm fisheye is nice

[Todd Spoth]

the sigma 15mm is nice i wish i hadnt sold it. i may pick up the canon version sometime.

and if you are intending on defishing, dont get the fisheye.

[David Seale]

todd, start a "post a pic and list all your equipment" thread. ill take a pic of my goods when i get home.

[Todd Spoth]

todd, start a "post a pic and list all your equipment" thread. ill take a pic of my goods when i get home.


haha nah, you post one

[SloESLex]

the sigma 15mm is nice i wish i hadnt sold it. i may pick up the canon version sometime.

and if you are intending on defishing, dont get the fisheye.
shit cock.

how about the 17-40?

been thinking about it...

or perhaps an equivalent sig.

[SloESLex]

the 24-70 gets much better reviews.

go to www.fredmiranda.com to read some reviews from, mainly, credible people.
i need something wider. my 24mm ain't cutting it.

[SHANGHAi]

i need something wider. my 24mm ain't cutting it.
get the 10-22!

[captobvious]

the sigma 15mm is nice i wish i hadnt sold it. i may pick up the canon version sometime.

and if you are intending on defishing, dont get the fisheye.
i enjoy the fisheye:thumb:

[SloESLex]

get the 10-22!
i want to be able to use it on a film body too.

[Todd Spoth]

popeye? sigma 12-24mm try that one out. drew can comment on it a bit more i think.

[zerinVR6]

17-40 f/4L
24-70 f2.8L
70-200 f2.8L

[gandhibrokemyskates]

28-75 f/2.8
70-300 f/4-5.6
20 f/1.8
kit lens
1 broke 50mm 1.8

28-75 is used 99% of the time.

[chreeno]

28-75 f/2.8
70-300 f/4-5.6
20 f/1.8
kit lens
1 broke 50mm 1.8

28-75 is used 99% of the time.

Tamron 28-75 f2.8?

I have the same lens.. stays on my camera most of the time too!

[JayDiem]

i want a 400mm 2.8L but you know. :(
ill let you borrow mine. :lol:

[gandhibrokemyskates]

Tamron 28-75 f2.8?

I have the same lens.. stays on my camera most of the time too!

yesssss. :yum:

[SloESLex]

popeye? sigma 12-24mm try that one out. drew can comment on it a bit more i think.
how about the 10-20?

price is cheaper, faster, and can use reg filters.


i'm under the assumption that the 12-24 is priced more becuase of picture quality....

[azinwood]

sigma 24-70 f/2.8
70-200 f/4L
50 f/1.8 II

[battousai]

man, all this is mumbo jumbo too me, but it sounds cool :o